I just finished another draft of a chapter for my second book. (By the way, my first book is now available in paperback as well.) The new chapter is based on the abstract linked to below, though I've made significant modifications that I think enhanced the chapter. I found this as I was researching which went very well with the ideas that inspired my chapter. In fact, it is rather nice to know that I noticed the same principles described by one of the best modern strategists. (The author's book on Roman strategy still dominates the field.) It tends to give me even more confidence that my second book will be even better than the first.
Here is from page twenty of Edward Luttwack's Strategy:
...critical
faculties are certainly more likely to be sharpened by failure; and if remedies
are offered to improve performance, they are less likely
to be resisted by inert conservatism because the hierarchical defenders of the
status quo, will have been undermined by defeat...With
victory, all of the army’s habits, procedures, structural arrangements,
tactics, and methods, will indiscriminately be confirmed as valid or even
brilliant-including those that were positively harmful, but with all of their
harm concealed by undissected experience of success...
Here is the last paragraph of my abstract that inspired the chapter:
Battlefield losses often inspire great soul searching and political, military, and cultural reform, while winning a war brings a whole new set of problems. From Rome to Britain, to American policy after World War II, the burden of hegemonic leadership is often assumed vigorously after outstanding military victory, but often unravels from within due to the demands of money and men and a slow decay of society’s ability, and desire, to furnish them.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Like-mindedness certainly is a great cause for increased confidence! Although I think your words were more succinct.
That's funny, I thought he explained it better.
Post a Comment